AI Search for ENT Doctors
Fourth sinus infection, a child's endless ear infections, hearing finally worth checking: each asks an AI first. We make yours the name it gives.
Get your free auditNo cost, no obligation, no lock-in contract.
See it live
Ask the three engines your patients use, and watch who they name. This is what a cited answer looks like when your practice is the one built to be quoted.
A live example. The tabs cycle through how each engine answers; a real practice is named and cited the same way.
What it is
AI search optimization, or AEO, is the work of getting your ENT practice named and cited when someone asks an AI engine about a symptom, a procedure, or where to get hearing aids near them. It structures your condition, procedure and audiology pages, your credentials and your practice identity so ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity can quote you as the answer.

Why this matters now
Search is moving from a page of links to a single answer. This is the shift your practice is being sorted by, whether or not anyone is optimising for it.
Industry figures from third-party 2026 research, directional and about the search shift itself, not this practice's results.
Recent results
Real Search Console and Bing screenshots. Practice names stay private, the numbers are untouched.

123K impressions and 550 clicks in 28 days, at an average position of 8.8.

1.94M impressions and 10.9K clicks in 3 months, holding an average position of 8.5.

108K impressions and 807 clicks in 28 days, at an average position of 14.5.

366 calls straight from the Business Profile in one month, up 13.3% year on year.

175 calls straight from the Business Profile in one month, up 65.4% year on year.

48.4K impressions in 28 days at an average position of 10.9.

196.8K AI citations across 123 pages, surfaced and cited by AI assistants.

A brand new website to 104K impressions in its first 3 months, and still climbing.

123K impressions and 550 clicks in 28 days, at an average position of 8.8.

1.94M impressions and 10.9K clicks in 3 months, holding an average position of 8.5.

108K impressions and 807 clicks in 28 days, at an average position of 14.5.

366 calls straight from the Business Profile in one month, up 13.3% year on year.

175 calls straight from the Business Profile in one month, up 65.4% year on year.

48.4K impressions in 28 days at an average position of 10.9.

196.8K AI citations across 123 pages, surfaced and cited by AI assistants.

A brand new website to 104K impressions in its first 3 months, and still climbing.
The same practice name, physician and audiologist list, and the right categories everywhere an engine looks, otolaryngology and audiology both. When your details disagree across directories, insurers and the hospital listing, a model cannot be sure which ENT practice you are, so it names one it can.
Sinusitis, vertigo, sleep apnea, tinnitus, balloon sinuplasty, septoplasty, and each hearing aid you fit, every one on its own page with a plain answer near the top. A model quotes a specific page, never a Services list that runs from tonsils to tinnitus in one breath.
The trust signals an engine leans on are a named, board-certified ENT, a fellowship or subspecialty, and a credentialed audiologist behind the hearing work. On a health question, that is what gets you cited over a chain page that no clinician stands behind.
Medical and FAQ schema, a 40-to-60-word answer under each heading, and symptom- and comparison-shaped subheads, balloon sinuplasty versus surgery, a snoring procedure versus a CPAP. This is the difference between a page an engine has to summarise and one it can quote word for word.
A parent whose child finally stopped getting ear infections, or a patient who could hear a grandchild again after a fitting, is glad to say so, and engines pull that language into their summaries. Reviews that name the problem and the result feed the exact phrasing an AI reaches for when it describes you.
A visible review date, current procedure content and up-to-date hearing-aid technology tell an engine the page is maintained. Stale pages get passed over on treatment and device questions, where an out-of-date answer is one the model is built to avoid.
What we do
Meet the founder
I’m Ashikur Rahman. I’ve spent the better part of a decade in SEO, most recently as Partner and SEO Manager at Doctor Rank, a medical and legal SEO agency I helped found. Every plan, every strategy and every client win there ran through me and my team. Proximity Ranker is the next step, my own agency, built the way I’ve always believed this work should be done.
I keep it small on purpose. We stay selective about who we sign and cap how many clients we take on, so nobody ends up with a template pulled from a drawer. We build your strategy around your specialty, your city and your goals. My own background is in law, an LL.B and an LL.M, and that turns out to be a real edge in YMYL niches like medicine and law, where Google and AI reward genuine expertise and trust.
Hire Proximity Ranker and you work with me, not an account manager. I look over every strategy, every author block and every AI search recommendation before it ships. Search has moved past ten blue links. Your next clients are already asking Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Perplexity who to trust, and earning a place inside those answers is the work I care about most.
Book a call and you talk to me directly, not an account manager.

How it runs
No lock-in contract. AI visibility is measurable, so you will see whether you are being named more often, on real patient questions, not asked to take it on faith.
We ask the engines the questions your patients ask, what a symptom means, whether a procedure beats surgery or a CPAP, where to get hearing aids near me, and record exactly what comes back: whether you are named, which page is cited, who is named instead, and where your identity disagrees with itself across the web. It returns as a prioritised list, worst gaps first. No charge and no obligation.
The heavy month. One consistent practice identity reconciled everywhere an engine looks, a quotable page for every condition, procedure and hearing service that lacks one, and schema for the practice, each physician and each audiologist so a model can resolve who you are.
The foundation is in, so now we make the site quotable. Short extractable answers under symptom- and comparison-shaped headings, the audiology line made its own entity, review language worked in, and presence built on the third-party sources these engines actually cite.
This is usually when it shows: your practice named in ChatGPT and AI Overviews on the questions that matter, more pages cited, and AI referral traffic pulled out of Direct so you can finally see it. We report on all of it.
Regular SEO earns a ranking; AI search earns a mention. An engine does not hand a patient ten links, it gives one answer and names a few practices inside it. That runs on different signals: a consistent identity, pages a model can quote, named credentialed physicians and the third-party sources it trusts. The two overlap, but optimising for a blue-link ranking does not automatically get you cited.
Constantly, because ENT is where people start with a symptom. Someone with a fourth sinus infection, a spinning-room episode, or a child who keeps getting ear infections asks an AI what it might be and who to see before they call. If the engine names three practices and yours is not one of them, you never enter the decision, and you never learn it happened.
Increasingly, and it is a real opening. Hearing test and hearing aid questions carry enormous volume, and most ENT sites bury audiology on one thin page an engine cannot cite specifically. Give each service and device a real page and make audiology its own entity, and you become the answer for hearing, not just for surgery, which is where most practices are invisible.
No, and anyone who guarantees a specific engine output is not being straight with you. What we can do is make your practice the easiest one in your area to cite, then measure it: we track your key questions across the engines every month and show you where you are named and where you are not. The trend is what we hold ourselves to.
It helps, because some engines read Google's results, but it is not the same job. A page can rank first and still never be quoted, because it is written to be clicked rather than lifted. And when Google answers with an AI Overview above your ranking, the click you earned can disappear into a summary that names someone else. Being cited in that summary is the work.
Not one page, and that is the point. A parent asking an AI about a child's ear tubes and a retiree asking about hearing aids are different questions, and a page that tries to answer both gets cited for neither. Each condition, procedure and audiology service needs its own quotable page, which is what lets a single practice get named across the whole range.
They do, and ENT reviews are unusually specific when the timing is right. A patient who could finally breathe through their nose, or hear a grandchild again, describes the outcome in words an engine lifts straight into its summary. Reviews that name the problem and the result give an AI the exact phrasing it reaches for when it describes you.
Three ways. We test your patient questions in each engine on a schedule and log whether you are named and cited. We separate AI referral traffic out of Direct, where most of it lands invisibly. And we tie both back toward booked appointments and fittings. You see the answers moving, not just a promise that they will.
Identity and schema fixes can change what engines say within a month or two, because those are the gaps that most often keep you out. Being consistently named on competitive procedure and hearing questions takes longer, usually three to six months, as the pages mature and the reviews build. Anyone promising instant AI dominance is selling something.
We ask the engines your patients' real questions and show you exactly what they say today: whether you are named, which pages are cited, who is named instead, and where your identity is working against you across the web. Back inside 24 to 48 hours with nothing owed.
Free audit
We ask the engines your patients' real questions and show you what they say today: who is named, which pages are cited, and where you are invisible. Back with you in 24 to 48 hours, at no cost.
Get your free auditNo cost, no obligation, no lock-in contract.